View Full Version: New sig's

MGSForums.com > Digital Art > New sig's



Title: New sig's
Description: I like them this time...opinions ?


BossATruePatriot - October 19, 2006 10:36 PM (GMT)
1 user posted image

2 user posted image

3 user posted image

1,2, Or 3 ??????

Refluxe - October 20, 2006 12:01 AM (GMT)
Hmm, I've come to the verdict of not liking any of them in the slightest. Why? Because I'm a cruel thoughtless bastard hellbent on making you suffer ... and:

In a strange stride for any justification to succeed in designing ... knowing what you're doing at all does kinda help. From your display of efforts so far, I can't help but think your lack of skill and/or creativity has generated ...number 1, 2 and 3.

1. user posted image
This is, in my opinion, displeasing to the eye. I'm not sure what's going on in general but it would appear icecubes have invaded your background ... or what I can only describe as 'blurry-bluey-whiteedged-type-square-thingies'. It needs sorting really. Towards the right side of the sig, the icecubes have melted I think and it's left a black area too. Doh!

On the issue of text, one word sums it up really: "FUCKETYHOOOOOO!". It's like you got out a chisel and hammered at them until they look like overcooked bent oven chips. Poor letters. But in all seriousness, why are they so rough looking? Make them smoother, make them blend in more or at least correspond with the background somewhat. Also position them better...or position them at all.

2. user posted image
Well in my opinion I say this is probably the 'best' and by 'best' I mean the one that I can tolerate for a few seconds longer than the others. See I kinda like the background here though it would be hard to pull it off in a sig and you didn't manage it. The top right text looks half decent but still too plain and not positioned well. The other text is as bad as its predecessor sig 1. I'll say no more...actually I will...
In general the sig doesn't have much to it, even if it was all positioned well with nice text, it'd still be too plain to look 'great'. Needs something more.

3. user posted image
I see your 'something more' has been attempted here but again with the bad positioning. I am referring to those symbols, not the most original of things to put in a sig but it generally works so good idea I guess. (Now I go all nazi on you again) ... but what the faaaack is going on with the strange glow? That's either extremely poor cutting or an effect gone so wrong, it kills my brain cells. 'Loyalty' looks like Harry Potter font which is plain stupid, may as well whack down a giant picture of Hagrid too. Other text I won't bother commenting on. However, the background isn't so bad, it has a nice vibe to it....just pretty much everything else on the sig was terrible.

Oh and for the love of GOD:
Add a border please sweety!
Key feature for designing, border border border. If you don't, your sig might spill onto the webpage and make a mess.

user posted image
You want that? No!

And furthermore, theming your designs will help. Get a general idea of what you want to design in your head and do that. Use tutorials to help as well. If you're using Adobe Photoshop, there are millions of 'em out there. The world is your oyster.

I rushed the end of this post as I can't be arsed and I'm sure you hate me enough but I was always criticized harshly when I was learning. All I wanted was a hug.

Yeah, I'm going now. T'ra.

BossATruePatriot - October 20, 2006 01:09 AM (GMT)
Wow, thank you, i needed that, i acualy knew that they were to plain, i never know what to make them about...But thank's alot you gave me a few idea, i'll edit the,m and put it back up and tell me what you think about them....




Hosted for free by InvisionFree