View Full Version: A NEW JCC SIGGAR!11!1!

MGSForums.com > Digital Art > A NEW JCC SIGGAR!11!1!



Title: A NEW JCC SIGGAR!11!1!


JCC - February 1, 2007 08:55 PM (GMT)
user posted image

It's not the greatest pic of Emmy Rossum, in fact it makes her look nowhere near as beautiful as she actually is, but it works bloody well for a sig.

Might make an ava tomorrow to go with it.

g-fox - February 1, 2007 09:11 PM (GMT)
i like your pink one better but not bad,kinda big though ;)

OcelotSnake - February 1, 2007 09:18 PM (GMT)
Yeah I agree a little big for a sig but still it fits your style ^_^ Try adding some more effects in future to vary your style, don't get bogged down with blending :P

Dani - February 1, 2007 10:01 PM (GMT)
It's simply too big, and too boxy. Try using thin, wide signatures to give a better look. Also, try something creative with your renders, like OS above you for example. And you overuse scanlines. 5/10

BleedPink - February 1, 2007 11:28 PM (GMT)
I was under the impression you said signature, not billboard.
Anyway, what have you done bar stick two images together. Turn up the contrast and add some text?

Darius649 - February 2, 2007 01:10 AM (GMT)
I don't really consider that a signature, way to big, make it 350 x 90 like I do, it's smaller and better, but if you like it then use it.

3/10

sadistic_greyfox - February 2, 2007 01:15 AM (GMT)
all their crituqes are right though, try to scale it down man. i can give you a few pointers over msn mang. 7 out of 10

JCC - February 2, 2007 08:03 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Dani @ Feb 1 2007, 10:01 PM)
It's simply too big, and too boxy. Try using thin, wide signatures to give a better look. Also, try something creative with your renders, like OS above you for example. And you overuse scanlines. 5/10

400 x 350 splashes are the norm on most graphics site I go to.

QUOTE
I was under the impression you said signature, not billboard.
Anyway, what have you done bar stick two images together. Turn up the contrast and add some text?


Had I been aiming to push the boundaries of graphics your comment would have upset me.

The whole point was for it to be simple and to click, to work, which I think it does. It's not about flashy backgrounds and stuff, that's on the different end of the spectrum. Sometimes simple does the job, if strange effects are all you look at when you see a sig, then you won't like anything simple.

QUOTE
I don't really consider that a signature, way to big, make it 350 x 90 like I do, it's smaller and better


350 x 90?!?! ... 90?!

Thanks to Dani and OS and Sad for giving constructive criticism, as for Bleed and Darius: Bleed: Look beyond technical wizardry and Darius: Rate my graphic as 3/10 when your sig isn't this.

Darius649 - February 2, 2007 09:28 PM (GMT)
I have the right to give it a 3/10, and I'm proud of my work so I don't care if you say that it sucks.




Hosted for free by InvisionFree