Title: Five worse movies you've ever seen
Description: And why?
wolfie - January 14, 2008 05:22 PM (GMT)
So lests list our most hate it movies in the industry. Mine do not have any particular order I just hate them all the same.
Babel: I hate this movie, because is suppouse to be a movie about people but the "people" in it are in such extreme situation that is almost imposible to indetify with any character. And what connects the stories is something presented so loosly that is just bordering the stupid.
Bloodrayne: Yes I made the mistake of watching this movie, itīs jut awful so bad that there is no way to begin numberong what is wrong with it. Well, I will say one thing they completly ruin the character of Rayne, just awful.
Once upon a time in Mexico: Here is the a movie that redifines crap. Is cheesy, the story is awful and with no apparent time line, I mean the weapons and cell phones were modern for the time it was release but the town where the president of Mexico resides seems taken from a 1910 border town.
Madagascar: A movie that tried to be like Finfng Nemo where you have kids jokes, but at the same time some adult content in the subjects it tried to present and fail in the worst way.
Doom: this movie embodies why is wrong to take games in to the big screen. The guionist change the story to make it politically correct the director tries to open a debate about a modern subject (the maping of the human genoma) completly out of context and in order to cut costs they invent somethng like the "arc" to justify space trabel. Just awful lets hope Halo And MGS learn from this movie.
Gatsby - January 14, 2008 09:24 PM (GMT)
Napoleon Dynamite- A movie based on the complete unlikability of it's main characters. While the movie's supposed lesson is to be accepting of others, it's constant punchlines always have to do with how nerdy Napoleon is, we're never laughing with him, we're laughing at him. Instead of trying to get behind what it means that the school's nerds unite to vote for Pedro is completely ignored and forgotten behind the guise of Napoleon's random dance at the end. It's a movie that doesn't respect itself, and doesn't respect it's audience. So it's disaster of a plot combined with the fact that it just isn't funny defiantly earn it a spot on my list.
Spider Man 3- Now I've been a gigantic fan of the Spider Man movie franchise. Spider Man 2 is one of my favorite movies of all time due to it's perfect balance of the real story behind Spider Man, it humanized Peter in a way that we can never see with people like Super Man.
Enter Spider Man 3, a movie that takes all the good things from Spider Man 2 and disregards them completely. Spider Man 2 had a cast that was just the right size? Alright, we'll give you twice as many characters and give them half the depth. Doc Oc is a great villain who the viewer can relate to, while still rooting for Spidey? Ok, well in this movie lets throw in three villains, ignore the most important one, make one nothing more then a fan service and make the third one a rip off of Doc Oc.
Oh, and you know how we had that one sequence that showed peter being happy while abandoning his powers while touching up on the guilt he feels for it? Well let's replace that with a sequence where we make Peter not evil, but just a complete douchebag who does pelvic thrusts on the streets while playing piano and doing the Swing.
I could go on forever, but it's a horrible movie, not just on it's own right, but for it's bastardization of a great franchise that I expect can't really recover from such a crock of shit.
X-Men 3- Oh look another super hero movie that ignores the great things that it's sequel accomplished while putting the franchise on a slow cruise control to hell. Basically same old stuff that ruined Spider Man 3. The characters are more concerned with making cool one liners then making intelligent conversation. The movie senselessly kills off it's main characters one by one to a point where there's almost no meaning to them, it's just "Oh whoops, I told Jean Grey that she had split ends and she demoleculerized me." It's better in Spider Man 3 in the sense that I at least gave a shit about one person, which was Magneto. All that crap aside, it pulled my heart strings to see him lose his powers, and gave me hope once he moved that chess piece regaining the slightest of his power.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All I can really think of right now. I'm usually really selective with the films I watch, I won't go to watch something like Harold and Kumar go to White Castle because I know it'll suck, however two of those movies surprised me with their suckiness while the other I knew would be bad.
jc55 - January 14, 2008 10:07 PM (GMT)
doubleo sigint - January 14, 2008 10:24 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Gatsby @ Jan 14 2008, 09:24 PM) |
Napoleon Dynamite- A movie based on the complete unlikability of it's main characters. While the movie's supposed lesson is to be accepting of others, it's constant punchlines always have to do with how nerdy Napoleon is, we're never laughing with him, we're laughing at him. Instead of trying to get behind what it means that the school's nerds unite to vote for Pedro is completely ignored and forgotten behind the guise of Napoleon's random dance at the end. It's a movie that doesn't respect itself, and doesn't respect it's audience. So it's disaster of a plot combined with the fact that it just isn't funny defiantly earn it a spot on my list.
Spider Man 3- Now I've been a gigantic fan of the Spider Man movie franchise. Spider Man 2 is one of my favorite movies of all time due to it's perfect balance of the real story behind Spider Man, it humanized Peter in a way that we can never see with people like Super Man.
Enter Spider Man 3, a movie that takes all the good things from Spider Man 2 and disregards them completely. Spider Man 2 had a cast that was just the right size? Alright, we'll give you twice as many characters and give them half the depth. Doc Oc is a great villain who the viewer can relate to, while still rooting for Spidey? Ok, well in this movie lets throw in three villains, ignore the most important one, make one nothing more then a fan service and make the third one a rip off of Doc Oc.
Oh, and you know how we had that one sequence that showed peter being happy while abandoning his powers while touching up on the guilt he feels for it? Well let's replace that with a sequence where we make Peter not evil, but just a complete douchebag who does pelvic thrusts on the streets while playing piano and doing the Swing.
I could go on forever, but it's a horrible movie, not just on it's own right, but for it's bastardization of a great franchise that I expect can't really recover from such a crock of shit.
X-Men 3- Oh look another super hero movie that ignores the great things that it's sequel accomplished while putting the franchise on a slow cruise control to hell. Basically same old stuff that ruined Spider Man 3. The characters are more concerned with making cool one liners then making intelligent conversation. The movie senselessly kills off it's main characters one by one to a point where there's almost no meaning to them, it's just "Oh whoops, I told Jean Grey that she had split ends and she demoleculerized me." It's better in Spider Man 3 in the sense that I at least gave a shit about one person, which was Magneto. All that crap aside, it pulled my heart strings to see him lose his powers, and gave me hope once he moved that chess piece regaining the slightest of his power.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All I can really think of right now. I'm usually really selective with the films I watch, I won't go to watch something like Harold and Kumar go to White Castle because I know it'll suck, however two of those movies surprised me with their suckiness while the other I knew would be bad. |
I would agree with you on spidy 3 but it didn't completely suck, it had great action seqences and the origin of sandman seqence deserves an oscar.
But yeah they definitely needed to make spidy more evil when he turned bad instead of dancing around like a little bitch, Sandman should not have been in this movie, they had to change the whole uncle Ben story just so they could make him more important to the story and not just an ordinary thug. This movie should have just had Venom and goblin 2 and it would have been a whole lot better, plus i love Topher Grace but he should not have been Venom.
Xmen 3 i thought was a great movie jean gray and wolverines character really shined for me. As for characters dieing, Professor X didn't die he's alive after the credits roll, Jean Gray dies mutiple times in the comic and comes back to life so they might include that if a sequel is made. As for Scott, well that was a pretty stupid choice lol.
King Snake - January 14, 2008 10:41 PM (GMT)
I liked Spiderman 3, had some great action.
And 300 is really some shit of a movie.
One of the worst movie I ever saw was "The Passion".
krypton_ls - January 14, 2008 11:56 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (jc55 @ Jan 14 2008, 10:07 PM) |
| 300. Terrible. |
Care to tell us why?
sadistic_greyfox - January 15, 2008 12:02 AM (GMT)
well You know, you can't please everyone, they will always be a few who interpret a movie in a whole other way.
Snake Liquid - January 15, 2008 12:43 AM (GMT)
1. The Marine: When I went to see it, I expected to see a good marine movie, because I'd never seen the trailers. I went with a friend of mine who wrestles so he likes John Cena. Anyways, the movie was extremely boring, with just about the most boring plot I've seen. Luckily, I was at the dollar theatre.
2. Jarhead: What the fuck.. That is just about all I have to say. I was expecting a good Desert Storm movie and it's just some shit recruit that never fires his sniper the entire movie. Waste of a rental.
I really haven't seen all that many bad movies. I usually know what the movie is going to be about when I watch it, and I've seen trailers. I guess I've just gotten lucky so far.
Solidus - January 15, 2008 12:50 AM (GMT)
Open Water.
I think ive pretty much blown this topic apart now. :P
People walked out complaining. What a load of shit, hour odd of 2 people floating in the sea.
BigBoss14 - January 15, 2008 12:53 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (jc55 @ Jan 14 2008, 10:07 PM) |
| 300. Terrible. |
you gotta be kidding me
wolfie - January 15, 2008 01:43 AM (GMT)
I really want to know why 300 jc55. I know is not a life changing movie, but it has is moments. Although the comic artist (Frank miller I think)doesnīt know anything about the true Sparta. Leonidas was not the king in a monarquic sence of the word, Sparta had a dual kinship with both kings were elected. And stay on topic people you do not need to name 5 but at least one if you are going to post.
Kendoki - January 15, 2008 01:47 AM (GMT)
Battle Royale 2.
This movie sucked so bad compared to the first. Lacked the fear/chaos of the situation, and the whole plot just kinda fell apart half way through.
EDIT: 300 being shit? I thought it was a good movie. Most people complained that it was just a big gore-fest and fighting the entire time. Well, what the hell would you expect from a movie about a war?
Null - January 15, 2008 03:09 AM (GMT)
I never saw 300, but I reckon I would of disliked it if i did. Which was the reason I steered away from it in the first place. Those types of period movies just bore the shite out of me.
Solid Snake8 - January 15, 2008 04:16 AM (GMT)
300 was ok in my opinion. Not in my worst movies or anything, but nowhere near my favorite movies. It did not live up to any of the hype it got really...
I would say my least favorite movie I've ever seen is....
I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry
Now obviously I was not expecting it to be very good anyway, but hell it had Adam Sandler in it so I thought, "What the hey!"
I didn't laugh ONE time.. Not even a giggle.
Equally bad...
Nacho Libre
Similarly to Chuck & Larry, I didn't laugh one time during the whole movie. Jack Black seemed to be on a roll with his goofy and funny parts up until this movie.
snake_ultsol - January 15, 2008 09:39 AM (GMT)
Resident Evil, Spiderman 3, X-men 3, Babel (I totally agree with wolfie), The Haunting.
jc55 - January 15, 2008 11:23 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (krypton_ls @ Jan 14 2008, 11:56 PM) |
| QUOTE (jc55 @ Jan 14 2008, 10:07 PM) | | 300. Terrible. |
Care to tell us why?
|
Poorly written, insidious and quite vulgar. Contained too many cheesy lines, so much so that the picture would have been better suited as an entry to Wisconsin's annual contest, rather than a genuine attempt at a block buster. Too much gore I think, desensitizing after 5 minutes in fact, which I can only think was as a compensatory measure for the neglected storyline (the less grotesque aspects that is). My issue here may lie with the fact that the film attempts to summarize (or trivialize rather) a very interesting aspect of Greek history into an arguably inaccurate perception of the Battle of Thermopylae. Even though this was the whole point of the film, I feel it was quite unbalanced: the battle scenes were very much acting as the chassis for the picture, not the history itself (i.e. the interesting parts).
Don't get me wrong, watching 300 steroid freaks go at it in the bloodiest way possible did serve as mild entertainment between toilet breaks, but as a historical motion picture is concerned, it fails. I assume that I am part of a minority in having gone to see this film with an expectation of seeing some history, amongst other things. All I recall is a sensation of pedestrianism about it all. Just didn't cut it for me, I'm afraid.
WHiTeFaLCoN - January 15, 2008 12:46 PM (GMT)
Daredevil
Reason- Ben Affleck
Mortal Kombat Annihilation
Reason: It exists. Crap plot, crap special effects, bad acting and rushed.
DOA: Dead Or Alive
Reason: Completely unfaithful to the video games, bad acting, weak plot and the women didn't have chests like airbags.
Looney Toons: Back In Action
Reason: About as funny as setting fire to your testicles, in fact its even less funny.
Doom
Reason: Nothing like the game at all.
Helikaon - January 15, 2008 07:14 PM (GMT)
Resident Evil:
Terrible plot ruined any chances of a faithful live action adaptation.
Spiderman 1, 2 and any sequence of 3 that didn't have the symbiote featured:
Terrible plot (s) ruined any chances of a faithful live action adaptation.
Alien Versus. Predator:
Terrible decision to set it on Earth ruined any chances of a faithful live action adaptation unless enough people understand AVP-R's ending to justify the ineviatble AVP3 to be set in space.
Where it belongs...
Gatsby - January 15, 2008 10:35 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (jc55 @ Jan 15 2008, 11:23 AM) |
| QUOTE (krypton_ls @ Jan 14 2008, 11:56 PM) | | QUOTE (jc55 @ Jan 14 2008, 10:07 PM) | | 300. Terrible. |
Care to tell us why?
|
Poorly written, insidious and quite vulgar. Contained too many cheesy lines, so much so that the picture would have been better suited as an entry to Wisconsin's annual contest, rather than a genuine attempt at a block buster. Too much gore I think, desensitizing after 5 minutes in fact, which I can only think was as a compensatory measure for the neglected storyline (the less grotesque aspects that is). My issue here may lie with the fact that the film attempts to summarize (or trivialize rather) a very interesting aspect of Greek history into an arguably inaccurate perception of the Battle of Thermopylae. Even though this was the whole point of the film, I feel it was quite unbalanced: the battle scenes were very much acting as the chassis for the picture, not the history itself (i.e. the interesting parts).
Don't get me wrong, watching 300 steroid freaks go at it in the bloodiest way possible did serve as mild entertainment between toilet breaks, but as a historical motion picture is concerned, it fails. I assume that I am part of a minority in having gone to see this film with an expectation of seeing some history, amongst other things. All I recall is a sensation of pedestrianism about it all. Just didn't cut it for me, I'm afraid.
|
I always like reading posts like these. it helps me separate the people who know about film from those who want to appear like they know about film.
doubleo sigint- The Spider Man series has frontlined more as a drama then anything, the action is supposed to serve as a catalyst to the plot, however when you don't even care about the characters anymore it's hard for you to care about it. The Harry versus Peter fights only really had me kind of slouching, sitting there as I waited for the story to move on. I believe those scenes should've been ones treated more delicatly, just like they were in Spider Man 2, constant tension between Peter and Henry.
When somebody like Doc Ock and Spider Man fight, I care about what happens. Because it seems real, we know Doc is capable of terrible things, and like I said we relate to him.
With Venom, nobody cares. Half because his actor was horrible and his dialogue sucked, his whole "God please kill Peter" thing actually had me laughing. He was just a fan service. He's not a good character or villain. Period. Carnage is better, Venom is a representation of the cheesiness that makes comic books so unadaptable as good films. They should've taken out Gwen Stacy, Venom and Sand Man and made it only Henry as the villain. His decent into madness due to his desire for revenge would've been much more fulfilling if it had been looked at more.
Spider Man 3 tried to hard, it took quantity over quality by cramming in too many storylines. I don't care what anybody says, there was nothing good about this film. How could anybody even get remotely into the action with random snips from that annoying news Anchor with the crowd cheering on the fight like it was some steel cage match?
And maybe X-Men 3 was a good comic book adaptation, but I'll state again, faithful comic book adaptations don't make good movies, at all.
MoeRon - January 15, 2008 10:41 PM (GMT)
1. Devilman - because it's just dumb
2. Uzumaki - no horror, just bullshit. gave me the feeling that japanese can't make movie's
3. Armageddon /Independence Day etc. - viva l'america. the rest of the world is just useless ...
4. The day after tomorrow - "Oh no! The chill is hunting me trough the house! Close the door, that's theire one weakness!!!"
5. probably more dumb movies i don't remember
btw. I liked the Doom movie, it was funny ^_^
dJdC - January 16, 2008 01:55 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Snake Liquid @ Jan 15 2008, 12:43 AM) |
2. Jarhead: What the fuck.. That is just about all I have to say. I was expecting a good Desert Storm movie and it's just some shit recruit that never fires his sniper the entire movie. Waste of a rental.
|
That is the truth about Desert Storm. There wasn't a lot of action for foot soldiers in that war.
WHiTeFaLCoN - January 16, 2008 12:39 PM (GMT)
Doom sucked, the ending made no sense. The zombies were naff and there was no plot about hell like with the game!
Metalmalitia23 - January 16, 2008 05:05 PM (GMT)
Can't really think of 5 but one of them is definatly Dark Water, that was the worst attempt at a horror movie i have ever seen. It was just so mindless and boring and was pretty much the same thing as every other horror movie that has come out since then. Actually come to think of it every horror movie i have seen since like 2001 has just sucked balls(with the exception of few), 1408 looked like it was gonna be awsome but then to no surprise it sucked and wasn't scary at all.
q8snake - January 17, 2008 10:23 AM (GMT)
Species-no comment to make
LarryTermite - January 24, 2008 03:09 AM (GMT)
I had to see two kids movies and I'm 14. Even Almighty and Underdog were shithouse. Silent Hill was like WTF so shithouse nothing happened, wasn't even scary. I'm sure theres more, Ive seen to many crap movies to remember lol.
Solid_Bauer - January 24, 2008 11:30 AM (GMT)
Worst movies I've seen. So far...;
1. Titanic - Don't get me started with this film. There are films where the soundtrack is way better than the film itself. And this is one of those films. I can't stand Leonardo Dicaprio or whatever his name is. And found the story pointless. Just my opinion, I can't stand this film. at all. it took forever to get to the part that i really did want to see. the damn boat going down. i thought that was what the film was going to be about. ugh... and before anybody asks. the reason why i watched this film was because i HAD to. had to watch it as part of an english assignment.
2. High School Musical - Sure, perhaps they're aimed at the younger audience. teenagers, preferably i guess. but god dammit! i'm sick to death about hearing about this. just slow and boring and a complete waste of film.
3. Hulk - I won't say anything about this. I fell asleep 45 minutes into the movie.
4. Harry Potter 3 & onwards - Chris Columbas did a SUPERB job on the first two movies! and with the 3rd book being my favourite, i was so disappointed about the movie. and then the 4th... that was the first time i ever fell asleep during the cinema. and from there, i've waited til the movies came out on DVD.
5. Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy - I honestly think these movies are way overhyped. the music is brilliant! i love it! johnny depp is fantastic. but these are just not my kind of films. entertaining, yes. but they aren't as fantastic as critics and people say in my opinion.
WHiTeFaLCoN - January 31, 2008 01:12 PM (GMT)
Titanic, High School Musical and Hulk I agree with, but Harry Potter and Pirates? :blink: You must be mad! :wacko:
abc123 - January 31, 2008 01:15 PM (GMT)
Not sure, they were all too crappy to remember. AVP2 was crap in my opinion, but Ive seen worse.
edit) ANOTHER GAY MOVIE is probably the worst Ive ever seen. Im not gay or anything, just thought it would be funny. Fuck was I wrong.
WHiTeFaLCoN - January 31, 2008 01:16 PM (GMT)
AVP2 was quite good, but it would have been better without the crappy human characters. Where the fuck is Ripley? There was a character!
codemaster57 - January 31, 2008 02:09 PM (GMT)
1. Final Destination 3 (My fucking god is there huge ass plot holes)
2. High School Musical (For fucking retards)
3. Doom (Hey let's make resident evil... on mars!!!)
4. Any movie featuring Will Ferrall (I'm pretty sure this guy is gay since he kisses a guy /dresses homosexually in every movie he does nowadays)
5. Any movie made by Uwe Boll (Seriously all his movies are crap)
-Frank Jaeger- - January 31, 2008 07:04 PM (GMT)
I can think of one movie right now!
Spiderman 3 - The main fight scenes was ace, I think they did Sandman and Venom really well, but Spidey Dancing, the hair, the pointing at girls, the way he acted, I just wanted to kick him in the nuts lol
abc123 - January 31, 2008 07:51 PM (GMT)
What exactly is this high school musical your all talking about? Im actually tempted to see it if its that bad.
codemaster57 - January 31, 2008 07:53 PM (GMT)
The movie is so cheery you might just get diabetes...
FearHeldDear - January 31, 2008 08:32 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (WHiTeFaLCoN @ Jan 15 2008, 08:46 AM) |
Daredevil Reason- Ben Affleck
Mortal Kombat Annihilation Reason: It exists. Crap plot, crap special effects, bad acting and rushed.
DOA: Dead Or Alive Reason: Completely unfaithful to the video games, bad acting, weak plot and the women didn't have chests like airbags.
Looney Toons: Back In Action Reason: About as funny as setting fire to your testicles, in fact its even less funny.
Doom Reason: Nothing like the game at all. |
Bingo! That movie is so much more atrocious than anything else I've seen posted in this topic. "You've been tricked!"
The worst I can think of is The Order. I don't even remember what it was about, really, I just remember the fat guy from the TV show "Still Standing" and some other dude were priests, and they uncovered some evil cult or something. I don't know, I just remember thinking it was the one of the worst things I'd ever seen, and that was when I was 11 or 12.
Snake Liquid - January 31, 2008 08:50 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (dJdC @ Jan 15 2008, 08:55 PM) |
| QUOTE (Snake Liquid @ Jan 15 2008, 12:43 AM) | 2. Jarhead: What the fuck.. That is just about all I have to say. I was expecting a good Desert Storm movie and it's just some shit recruit that never fires his sniper the entire movie. Waste of a rental.
|
That is the truth about Desert Storm. There wasn't a lot of action for foot soldiers in that war.
|
That's true. There wasn't much fighting. However, there was some fighting with the infantry. There were quite a few people killed. When I rented the movie, I didn't expect some half assed sniper that did nothing. Seriously, he seemed like a very shitty soldier throughout the entire movie. I would have liked to focus on what happened during that conflict, rather than some sniper winning over his drill sergeant..
Solid_Bauer - February 1, 2008 09:28 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (WHiTeFaLCoN @ Jan 31 2008, 01:12 PM) |
| Titanic, High School Musical and Hulk I agree with, but Harry Potter and Pirates? :blink: You must be mad! :wacko: |
People wished I was when I tell them that.
I think Chris Columbus leaving Harry Potter after the second movie was a mistake. I think he could have made these latest movies ALOT better than what I think they are.
And pirates. I'm not a fan of pirate movies. The only way I went to see the first Pirates movie was while I was on vacation and me and my older sister had made this deal. If I went to go and see Pirates with her. She would have to come with me to go and see Terminator 3. Except we ended up seeing Pirates together. And then she ditched me when it came to seeing Terminator 3.
Then I got dragged to see the second movie. I got outnumbered in a vote of what to see. And then I went to go and see the 3rd one just to see how it all ends.
I was really disappointed with those movies. I thought the press and a lot of people were overhyping them.
WHiTeFaLCoN - February 1, 2008 12:49 PM (GMT)
To each their own I guess. ;)
Another movie comes to mind, Dungeons & Dragons. It was like a demonstration of how all the ways the Lord Of The Rings could have gone wrong. They made a sequel apparently, you can see it sometimes on the Sci-Fi channel. WTF? The first movie sucked, and the second is probably so bad it ends up on TV instead of the cinema! Don't these people get the hint? We don't want their shitty movies, stop trying and work on something else! And since when is Dungeons and Dragons Sci-Fi???!!!
Gatsby - February 1, 2008 03:11 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Solid_Bauer @ Feb 1 2008, 09:28 AM) |
| QUOTE (WHiTeFaLCoN @ Jan 31 2008, 01:12 PM) | | Titanic, High School Musical and Hulk I agree with, but Harry Potter and Pirates? :blink: You must be mad! :wacko: |
People wished I was when I tell them that.
I think Chris Columbus leaving Harry Potter after the second movie was a mistake. I think he could have made these latest movies ALOT better than what I think they are.
|
I disagree, I think the main problem with the Harry Potter directors is their inability to increase film length to accommodate the ever increasing size of the books.
So if you're a Director who has two hours to film no matter what, but has three times the material, they're obviously going to go with all the sequences that let them make awesome CGI fights.
In doing this, the movies after Chamber of Secrets really don't have much of a soul, it's just Harry talking for 15 minutes, insert CGI induced sequence here, movie over.
That's why the Sixth film is also going to be bad.
However I've heard rumors that they are in fact splitting the 7th film into two movies in order to accommodate the sequences with Ron and the gang in the forrest along with all the awesome stuff like the Battle of Hogworts(which has the potential to be one of the most epic battle scenes of all time)
I also agree with you on the Pirates trilogy, however the first one was brilliant, it wasn't excellent but it gave a great amount of originality and the first time around Captain Jack was an excellent and new character who lit the screen up.
WHiTeFaLCoN - February 12, 2008 01:29 PM (GMT)
Have you even read the Harry Potter books? I have, and one of the greatest joys is seeing them being portrayed so well on the big screen, so I'm afraid that I disagree.
Solid_Bauer - February 12, 2008 07:50 PM (GMT)
I have actually read some of the books. My parents bought me books 1-4 the other year. And then my sister gave me her old copy of book 5 sometime ago. when i wasn't interested in them anymore.
The books are a joy to read. I will admit that. But I got more into my writing than my reading. Only had the enthusiasm to read The Philsophers Stone, Chamber of Secrets and Prisoner of Azkaban. Can't be bothered with the others.