Title: the graphics
thico_ - June 6, 2005 11:34 AM (GMT)
have you noticed that mga2 graphics is (omg) worse than in the first mga!? I guess its because theyre plannin to make bigger locations, but I dont like it anyway, everything seems/is so... yellow. not like in the previous game: dark, gray. but the cqc rocks! lol
NeoRanger - June 6, 2005 05:47 PM (GMT)
They're not worse, technically they are better. They are just using a different technique, which is known not to appeal to many. From what I've been able to tell from the trailer, they are using cell-shading (kinda like the first Hulk game, or XIII or the upcoming Ultimate Spiderman). On top of that, they are setting the game during day time (the enviroments look a lot like MGS2), which means that lighting is different. Even though I'm not fan of this technique either, the game doesn't look bad at all. Only thing that bothered me was that horrid port of the Ocelot model from MGS1.
JinTox - June 7, 2005 03:21 PM (GMT)
I am not sure, but I think they are using Cell Shading ( as NeoRanger is saying ), but think about MGS2 Substance, they used Cell Shading, and that worked out great, right?
thico_ - June 7, 2005 06:57 PM (GMT)
yeah, Ive also noticed that konami used cell shading, but still (imho) it looks a lot worse than the mga graphics :/
JinTox, vr in mgs2s isnt cell shaded environment
Liquid Metal Face - June 9, 2005 04:58 AM (GMT)
Solid Fox - June 12, 2005 05:12 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Liquid Metal Face @ Jun 9 2005, 06:58 AM) |
| Cell-shading is nice. |
You think so.
I don't.
Cell-shading
*Zelda*
:wacko: yikes!
Ugh...
I don't want a comic style game, I want a realistic game.
Ocelot05 - June 14, 2005 08:33 PM (GMT)
Realistic games rule. I don't like cel-shading and i don't like Zelda anyway. I thought MGS was SUPPOSED to be realistic?
NeoRanger - June 14, 2005 09:23 PM (GMT)
Because bipedal nuclear capable tanks, vampires, resurrected commandos, ghosts that show you the bomb timer and talking hands are the definition of realism in a game, right?
MGS is sci-fi. It uses as realistic explanations as possible for every little thing in the game, but it's still sci-fi with a hint of fantasy (as proven in MGS3).
Cell shading isn't bad at all if it's used properly. Like I said it's not my favorite technique either, but have a good look at ZOE2 and tell me it didn't look absolutely beautiful.
micster - June 14, 2005 09:54 PM (GMT)
eh? Hold on worse???? It looks great!
BigBossII - June 16, 2005 02:56 AM (GMT)
Ac!d's graphics should be less enhanced then the others. hopefully.. ;)
Ocelot05 - June 16, 2005 08:59 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (NeoRanger @ Jun 14 2005, 09:23 PM) |
Because bipedal nuclear capable tanks, vampires, resurrected commandos, ghosts that show you the bomb timer and talking hands are the definition of realism in a game, right?
MGS is sci-fi. It uses as realistic explanations as possible for every little thing in the game, but it's still sci-fi with a hint of fantasy (as proven in MGS3).
Cell shading isn't bad at all if it's used properly. Like I said it's not my favorite technique either, but have a good look at ZOE2 and tell me it didn't look absolutely beautiful. |
I meant: It's realistic LOOKING. So why should cel-shading ruin it for us? Oh BTW, if you were referring to Vamp as being as being a vampire,I think you're wrong.... :rolleyes:
gray-fox - June 16, 2005 09:22 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Ocelot05 @ Jun 16 2005, 09:59 AM) |
| QUOTE (NeoRanger @ Jun 14 2005, 09:23 PM) | Because bipedal nuclear capable tanks, vampires, resurrected commandos, ghosts that show you the bomb timer and talking hands are the definition of realism in a game, right?
MGS is sci-fi. It uses as realistic explanations as possible for every little thing in the game, but it's still sci-fi with a hint of fantasy (as proven in MGS3).
Cell shading isn't bad at all if it's used properly. Like I said it's not my favorite technique either, but have a good look at ZOE2 and tell me it didn't look absolutely beautiful. |
I meant: It's realistic LOOKING. So why should cel-shading ruin it for us? Oh BTW, if you were referring to Vamp as being as being a vampire,I think you're wrong.... :rolleyes:
|
Your obivisly not looking at this through the graphical ponit of view.
If you just want your gameplay go play MGA1 or somethin'.
If you look at it through the graphicly ponit of view it's a beautiful.
And when you say:
"So why should cel-shading ruin it for us?"
Ruin it for you. So your not going to play it because of a little Cell-Shading? Pfft.
NeoRanger - June 16, 2005 05:49 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Ocelot05 @ Jun 16 2005, 08:59 AM) |
| [QUOTE=NeoRanger,Jun 14 2005, 09:23 PM]Oh BTW, if you were referring to Vamp as being as being a vampire,I think you're wrong.... :rolleyes: |
Really? No kidding... :roll:
He's not normal, that's the point.