Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel!

We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community today!

If you are already a member, please log in to your account to access all of your features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Nuclear Energy; Limitless clean fuel source, or WMD?
Topic Started: Jul 1 2008, 11:42 PM (159 Views)
GraySnake182
Member Avatar
Snake-eating Son of A Patriot
What are everyone's views on man's ability to harness the energy created by nuclear fusion? Is it right to use such energy, or in its discovery, did man merely doom himself to ultimate destruction?
"Everything has its beginning. But it doesn't start at one. It starts long before that - in chaos. The world is born - from zero. The moment zero becomes one is the moment the world springs to life. One becomes two, two becomes 10, 10 becomes 100. Taking it all back to one solves nothing. So long as zero remains, one will eventually grow to 100 again." -
Spoiler: click to toggle
Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots[/big]
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kisskissbangbang
Member Avatar
Fetish for you.

GraySnake182
Jul 1 2008, 11:42 PM
What are everyone's views on man's ability to harness the energy created by nuclear fusion? Is it right to use such energy, or in its discovery, did man merely doom himself to ultimate destruction?
Considering the fact we've only got 50 years of oil and gas left and about a 100 of coal [i think]we're going to have to rely on nuclear, especially when the power output is so much greater than the amount required to run it.

Isnt it something like a 1kg of uranium produces 20 trillion jules which with coal reuqires 1500kg?

People who oppose nuclear power plants are just hippies or rely solely on renewables.

So nuclear=good [if used correctly]
Edited by kisskissbangbang, Jul 3 2008, 09:35 PM.
Beatdowns on the brain.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Bodrul
Light Infantry
nuclear energy produces more power out of less natural resources (Uranium)
and requires less space and produces less polution then coal and oil plants.

and unlike wind and solar doesnt require vast areas of land.

only downside is the waste thats produced which can take decades to disintergrate
Posted Image
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Roy Campbell
Member Avatar
Neko Boy

There is a HUGE difference between Nuclear Fission and Nuclear Fusion. We are currently using Nuclear Fission so I am all for that but Fusion is something we do not yet have the technology to harvest. Scientists believe that they will have a fully working efficient Fusion reactor up and running in around 20 years time - as long as there are no nasty effects which they haven't yet found, I'll be all for that as well. They need to get their act sorted out with the whole Nuclear waste thing though, they are doing a shit job of it at the moment.
Posted Image
Oasis: Better than you since 1991

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kisskissbangbang
Member Avatar
Fetish for you.

Roy Campbell
Jul 4 2008, 06:46 PM
There is a HUGE difference between Nuclear Fission and Nuclear Fusion. We are currently using Nuclear Fission so I am all for that but Fusion is something we do not yet have the technology to harvest. Scientists believe that they will have a fully working efficient Fusion reactor up and running in around 20 years time - as long as there are no nasty effects which they haven't yet found, I'll be all for that as well. They need to get their act sorted out with the whole Nuclear waste thing though, they are doing a shit job of it at the moment.
Well radioactive waste is incredibly difficult to dispose of you know.

Just throwing it out there thats all.
Beatdowns on the brain.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Splitter Snake
Member Avatar


Too be honest, I doubt I'm around in 50+ years, so I don't really care...sad, but true.
Posted Image
A Brand New MGO.
We've only just began...

MGO: Naked Obama, LVL6, Hound
MGO Alt: War Bunny, LVL6, Unranked
Clan: War Bunnies (No, I'm not the leader)

WarBunnies.net
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dJdC
Member Avatar
TEAM SLUG

Splitter Snake
Jul 4 2008, 10:06 PM
Too be honest, I doubt I'm around in 50+ years, so I don't really care...sad, but true.
doesn't mean you wont feel the effects from it before we run out. Were feeling the effects now. Imagine how bad it will be in 10 years if we don't find a solution.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kisskissbangbang
Member Avatar
Fetish for you.

Splitter Snake
Jul 4 2008, 10:06 PM
Too be honest, I doubt I'm around in 50+ years, so I don't really care...sad, but true.
Wait so just because it MIGHT not personally effect you, you dont care about what actions our countries take in providing fuel, one of the main forces that drives our economy?

Spoken like an ignorant kid.

Beatdowns on the brain.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Solid Spartan
Member Avatar
You cannot change your fate. No man can.

It's both. When handled correctly, it's a clean and efficient fuel source. But one wrong (or right, in the case of certain dictators) move and it jumps straight to WMD.

I'm all for clean and limitless energy sources here, but surely we can come up with something which doesn't have a 25,000-year radioactive downside? :(
Posted Image
(^ See that, r0b? I kept it all this time. :) )

FOXHOUND Recruitment, V.2
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Burlynate
Member Avatar
Jail Guard
nuclear power plants are last years technology
fast neutron reactors are where the future is
-fast neutron reactors can run off of processed(?) spent nuclear fuel
-fast neutron reactors reduce the radioactivity from about 10,000 years to a few hundred
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf98.html
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Solid Spartan
Member Avatar
You cannot change your fate. No man can.

Burlynate
Jul 22 2008, 02:52 AM
nuclear power plants are last years technology
fast neutron reactors are where the future is
-fast neutron reactors can run off of processed(?) spent nuclear fuel
-fast neutron reactors reduce the radioactivity from about 10,000 years to a few hundred
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf98.html
That's good news. :)
Posted Image
(^ See that, r0b? I kept it all this time. :) )

FOXHOUND Recruitment, V.2
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
GraySnake182
Member Avatar
Snake-eating Son of A Patriot
Nuclear energy is still being perfected. Obviously, its potential as a weapon is nearly limitless. The waste is an unfortunate side effect produced from using it correctly, but that is being worked on. Imagine the potential of "dark matter" in a purified state resulting from nuclear fusion. A gram of pure "dark matter" has the energy yield equivalent of 2kg of uranium when detonated, and can put out enough energy in its purest form to power New York City for three days. That is ONE GRAM of "Dark Matter" or "antimatter" as it is sometimes called, which is created by nuclear fusion, and also results from atomic collisions.
"Everything has its beginning. But it doesn't start at one. It starts long before that - in chaos. The world is born - from zero. The moment zero becomes one is the moment the world springs to life. One becomes two, two becomes 10, 10 becomes 100. Taking it all back to one solves nothing. So long as zero remains, one will eventually grow to 100 again." -
Spoiler: click to toggle
Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots[/big]
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Burlynate
Member Avatar
Jail Guard
dark matter =/= antimatter
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
OuterJaccob
Member Avatar
loves you

I don't like the idea of it, I was only about 10 but I remember Chernobyl like it was yesterday, it was a result of human error, which is something no amount of technology can account for.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Opinions/Confessions · Next Topic »
Add Reply
Admin · Global Moderator · Forum Moderator · Emeritus · Member · Validating · Banned