| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community today! If you are already a member, please log in to your account to access all of your features: |
| World War 3; Possibility? | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jun 2 2008, 09:32 PM (2,007 Views) | |
| kisskissbangbang | Jun 2 2008, 09:32 PM Post #1 |
Fetish for you.
|
So any thoughts? For me right now, there arent any major alliances against the only big power-yes people it is the USA. So,for there to be a World War you need fairly even sides, and seeing as there is no is no real alliances that can actually oppose America and its bum chums i.e the U.K.....another World War is pretty far away and implausbile in the near future in my book |
| Beatdowns on the brain. | |
 |
|
| VII | Jun 2 2008, 09:36 PM Post #2 |
Light Infantry
|
itll be china trying to take over and cause problems ..not everyone against the USA
Edited by VII, Jun 2 2008, 09:36 PM.
|
Signature removed due to graphic violence. - MGSF Staff  | |
|
|
|
| wertwhile | Jun 2 2008, 09:48 PM Post #3 |
|
Heavily-Armed Trooper
|
If your talking about major alliances then it would be the shanghai cooperation (Russia, China, and several other central asian states) against NATO. But there really would be no point to that the shanghai cooperation really wouldnt stand a chance, at least for now. And again what reason would China have to go to war against the NATO they would lose a lot of their economy and business so I really doubt that would ever happen. Im sure Russia would like to have at the NATO though but they would never do it without China. Edited by wertwhile, Jun 2 2008, 10:09 PM.
|
|
|
|
| UrbanCombat | Jun 2 2008, 09:48 PM Post #4 |
Shining Knight
|
What are you talking about? Why are you talking as if America is the only country out there? |
 
| |
|
|
|
| Samuraisedge18 | Jun 2 2008, 09:54 PM Post #5 |
Lunatic Wizard
|
yea china has an immense army. they say never go to war with china, you'll never get out of it. although people are saying about iraq but that's because of insurgents and people not wanting us in their country. anyway this topic is not about iraq. you wouldn't get out of a war with china because the have so many soldiers |
| |
|
|
|
| wertwhile | Jun 2 2008, 10:08 PM Post #6 |
|
Heavily-Armed Trooper
|
Sorry your right I'll change that to NATO As to samurai true NATO couldn't defeat there people if they rebelled. But we could easily defeat their government. Edited by wertwhile, Jun 2 2008, 10:10 PM.
|
|
|
|
| Samuraisedge18 | Jun 2 2008, 10:18 PM Post #7 |
|
Lunatic Wizard
|
you mean we would outsmart them for lack of a better term? or are you talking about communism? |
|
| |
|
|
|
| wertwhile | Jun 2 2008, 10:30 PM Post #8 |
|
Heavily-Armed Trooper
|
No im saying that NATO would defeat the Chinese government in a war. |
|
|
|
| Samuraisedge18 | Jun 3 2008, 02:36 AM Post #9 |
|
Lunatic Wizard
|
how? what will they do? |
|
| |
|
|
|
| joey2joey | Jun 3 2008, 04:59 AM Post #10 |
Jail Guard
|
I highly doubt WWIII would happen unless there is a new anti nuke device that works with 100% efficency. No country is stupid enough to end the world because of views. If there where such a device, I would still doubt it, because China doesn't want to lose their economy, and russia doesn't have enough troops. NATO counts for 75% of all the world military spending so, even if there where such a device, no country would want to go up against NATO. |
| I hear it's amazing when the famous purple stuffed worm in flap-jaw space with the tuning fork does a raw blink on Hari Kiri Rock. I need scissors! 61! | |
|
|
|
| wertwhile | Jun 3 2008, 10:40 AM Post #11 |
|
Heavily-Armed Trooper
|
Extremely better technology(better weapons,missle defense), better training, larger navy (usa), Superior and larger airforce. So all they have to do is use that and it would be an easy victory, and as I pointed out their nuclear missles would be pointless with our missle defense systems. I also heard on a news station ,according to the man in the pentagon whos job it is to defeat China If we were to go to war with them, he said that in terms of going to war with China we'd have an easy victory. |
|
|
|
| kisskissbangbang | Jun 3 2008, 11:45 AM Post #12 |
|
Fetish for you.
|
Exactly. Nobody is stupid enough to fight with NATO unless they have a guaranteed security of an alliance that can actually rival that of Americas. The nations that we would fight [Russia, China, Pakistan etc] are very conventional...and know that a war with the NATO would destroy their economy because of globalization. Honestly, I really am looking foward to WW3. Why? Because after that I really believe the USA and UK etc., who will obviouly win in the end, will not make the same mistakes and give total sovereignty to defeated and conquered nations. We will do as we did with Japan, neutralize them, take away any offensive military capabilities, force them to adopt democracy and free-economic policies, and force them to be our little friends. After that the world will truly have a peace we have never seen. I say bring it on. |
| Beatdowns on the brain. | |
|
|
|
| Roy Campbell | Jun 3 2008, 07:12 PM Post #13 |
Neko Boy
|
Well World War III is very far off in our current situation, everything is fine and dandy (between the major countries, yes there is trouble in the middle east but not enough to be even close to being called a world war). However (this may be a bit MGS-esque but) as long as there are people, a World War will always be inevitable one time or another, be in soon or many years away. As for what the war could be about, there is one topic that sticks out like a sore thumb - oil. The world oil supplies are dwindling and fast. Not only that but more countries and more area are getting progressively bigger and using more and more oil such as quite a few asian countries which didn't use oil before. When the oil runs out there is going to be mayhem, wars could even break out for the last of it and there could be a full scale World War just for the oil. Water shortages in the distant future could also be a cause of war. If a world war breaks out, who would it be between? Well, the dominant powers in world are America, the EU, China and to a lesser extent Russia and parts of the middle east. Any of those could join forces or launch an attack on the other. Yes, the EU and America might be buddy buddy now but apply the right amount of pressure (i.e no oil) and that friendship accounts for nothing. There would NOT be a nuclear war though, no one is that stupid enough to launch a nuclear weapon. Even those chinese wouldn't dare think about it, it would surely lead to the 'end of the world as we know it'. The war would be fought out man v man, tank v tank, plane v plane etc. The latter 2 might not even take part if there is no oil left. The winner(s) will depend on how many men and vehicles they have as well as who their allies are. Edited by Roy Campbell, Jun 3 2008, 07:12 PM.
|
| |
|
|
| BigBoss14 | Jun 3 2008, 07:15 PM Post #14 |
Hungry people don't stay hungry for long.
|
hears my scenario of WWIII the axis alliance or whatever is China, Russia, N. Korea, Iran, and the terrorist organizations. Versus the NATO countries. 911 was encouraged by Russia and China to try and get america to attack the middle east making Americas military weaker and hurting the economy. In return they promised that the Iran will have complete control over the middle east including Israel. While Russia and China divide everything else. In this war I see the NATO countries losing because most of the world turns a blind eye to Russia and China, China especially becoming the most strongest military and economic force on the planet. |
  PSN: BigBoss15 MGO Tag: KfcPatriot | |
|
|
|
| Splitter Snake | Jun 5 2008, 02:59 AM Post #15 |
|
It's already started dude, if you don't see it, you're either blind or in denial. Edited by Splitter Snake, Jun 5 2008, 03:00 AM.
|
 A Brand New MGO. We've only just began... | |
|
|
|
| wraith shadow | Jun 5 2008, 03:04 AM Post #16 |
Sieg Zeon!
|
Whats going on in the mid eastern countriesis not really a war. Anyways I don't see a World war 3 happening any time soon due to the fact that all the countries are scared of eachother to make a move. |
 CREDIT TO CODEMASTER  I CANT SPEL | |
|
|
|
| Splitter Snake | Jun 5 2008, 03:17 AM Post #17 |
|
Well what I mean is that tension is starting form among all of the nations of the world basically. Indeed, I dont' see nuclear war happening because I don't think people are that stupid, but I do believe we are on the verge of another World War. |
|
A Brand New MGO. We've only just began... | |
|
|
|
| Roy Campbell | Jun 5 2008, 06:35 PM Post #18 |
|
Neko Boy
|
Not a war?? What constitutes as a war to you then? As far as I can see, there is armed combat and many people dying which is what a war is. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| BigBoss14 | Jun 5 2008, 07:38 PM Post #19 |
|
Hungry people don't stay hungry for long.
|
Well if you guys wanna put a world war in that terms than pretty much every war since WW2 has been a world war meaning the UN and NATO forces |
|
PSN: BigBoss15 MGO Tag: KfcPatriot | |
|
|
|
| Gatso | Jun 5 2008, 08:28 PM Post #20 |
 
|
WTF are you going on about.. Why dont you go ask George H. W. Bush what he thinks to that statement about the UK being up Americas arse.. 
Edited by Gatso, Jun 5 2008, 08:44 PM.
|
 You don't want to kill me 47, Im just like you! | |
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Opinions/Confessions · Next Topic » |
8:12 PM Dec 1